Please see a poster for this RSPB sponsored talk by clicking on the link below:
The combined policy can be seen by clicking on the link below:
Orpington Field Club – Autumn/Winter Talks – 2018/19
Five talks have been arranged for mainly the second Saturday afternoons from October to February at BEECHE, High Elms Country Park, Shire Lane, Farnborough, BR6 7JH. These will be between 1.30pm and 3.30pm giving members and visitors a chance to network! All visitors are welcome, especially those from Bromley’s Friends Groups, Kent Wildlife Trust and Local RSPB members and anyone with an interest in natural history. Entrance is by a £3.00 donation which includes refreshments.
October 13th Kent’s Wild Year Simon Ginnaw
Simon makes a welcome return to show us more photographs included in his multi-media presentation. His talk outlines his travels around Kent through the seasons looking at the county’s wildlife and landscapes.
November 17th 20 Years of Nest-boxing Bob Francis
An illustrated talk about Bob’s 20 years experience of checking nest boxes of all type (Birds and Small Mammals) and being fascinated, horrified, surprised and sometimes puzzled by their contacts.
December 8th Urban Reserves Alison Ruyter
A positive look at how nature can thrive in some of the places we least expect. The talk will be based mostly on some Kent Wildlife Trust Reserves.
January 12th A Wildlife of Yellowstone National Park Duncan Mc Donald
Duncan gave the Orpington Field Club a talk last year on his wildlife journeys through Europe. He is now making a welcome return. He has previously worked as a Countryside Ranger for the Highland Council within the Cairngorms National Park as well as being a guide for Speyside Wildlife. His passion for wildlife and conservation has taken him across the globe. His illustrated talk this time will outline his trips to the Yellowstone National Park, USA
February 9th The Spanish Bluebell – Menace or Misunderstood Fred Rumsey
Fred’s talk will firstly focus on what we know about the Bluebell (Hyacinthoids – non scripta) and related species and describe the research he was involved with aimed at addressing the alarmist claims which have been made about the imminent demise of our native Bluebell and the Spanish Bluebell’s introduction and spread.
Once again the Friends had a stall at the Keston Fair on Sunday 24th June 2018. There was brilliant sunshine and another fine performance by the Morris dancers.
The fair had to compete for an audience with the Greyhound pub which was showing England v Panama in the group stage. There was no need to check the score on a portable ‘phone as the cheering for every goal was hearty.
Every stall was getting lots of visitors, before and after kick off time, so ample money was raised.
Jupiter is now a fine sight in the western sky after sunset. I took a picture of the solar system’s largest planet on the 4th June 2018. You can just about see three of Jupiter’s four Galilean moons close to the planet. Through a telescope, the 4th Galilean moon was also visible but very close to the planet. The camera’s telephoto lens which magnifies about 9 times was unable to resolve the closest moon within the glare. I used a tripod and an exposure of 1/8th second. It is not the best of photographs but shows what can be done with amateur equipment.
Jupiter is still prominent in the sky and you should be able to see the planet and all its 4 Galilean moons ( provided they are in the right position) through 8×40 binoculars. You will need to steady your hands by jamming them against a solid object or steady the binoculars by using a tripod.
My photograph was taken from our garden near the woods. Shortly after observing Jupiter my wife and I were treated to the call of a solitary tawny owl circling above our heads but we could not see it.
Why not get yourself out into the reserve to look at Jupiter after sunset the woods are dark enough for you to see it shine brilliantly. You might also be treated to the sound of a tawny owl and you might even be able to catch a sight of a bat if your eyes are allowed to adjust to the feeble light.
Bird Survey as at 16th July 2018 – Richard Pearce and Trevor Morgan
We have been conducting a bird survey, mostly weekly, since 19th April 2018. We have been counting the number of birds of the species that we have seen. Three areas have been surveyed – Darrick Wood and Meadow, Newstead Wood and Meadow and Darrick Wood Hornbeam area/Broadwater Wood.
It should be noted that this is not a scientific survey and bird numbers cannot be accurate as birds are very mobile. We have only recorded species which we can positivity identify by sight.
A list of bird species seen and recorded is shown below (20 Species):
Greater Spotted Woodpecker
Long Tailed Tit
House/ Tree Sparrow
Ring Necked Parakeet
Stock Dove (2 seen on 17th July 2018 in Darrick Wood meadow but not yet formally reported)
Birds heard on survey but not positively identified by sight (2 or 3 species)
Garden warblers, Black caps – these two species can easily be confused by song.
Chiffchaff – warbler family
Other birds reported as seen or heard by members but not recorded on survey (11 Species).
NB, some members are better at identifying birds by call rather than sight. Also some bird species such as starlings and jackdaws are capable of mimicking other bird species to the confusion of humans and the mimicked species.
Goldcrest – photo on website
Buzzard – Photo Member’s article in News Letter
Black Caps – heard
Possible sighting of Black Cap on Darrick Wood meadow during survey – too fast for positive identification.
Tawny Owl – heard and seen
Black Headed Gull
Not seen on Bird Survey but expected (3 species)
Last year tree bees were observed nesting in the woods and we published an article about them in the Newsletter. I am pleased to report that the tree bees are nesting in the same location this year. These pictures were taken on the 5th of June 2018.
We are lucky that the diversity of the wild-life in the woods seems to be improving. Unfortunately, the photography is not improving; the nest was heavily shaded which is not conducive to getting pin sharp pictures using amateur equipment.
Oak Processionary Moth (Thaumetopoea processionea) by Trevor Morgan
The Oak Processionary Moth has established itself in London the South East of England since 2005. It was introduced by imported oak trees from Southern Europe. The moth is a danger to its plant hosts. The caterpillars can strip the leaves off an oak to endanger the life of the tree. The caterpillars also represent a threat to humans, our pets and livestock. The caterpillars also represent a threat to wild mammals.
They are not common in the London area, but they have established colonies in Bromley in the near past and they are present in Bexley and west London now. High Elms park is on high alert; and there are plenty of oak trees in Darrick wood, so our park is vulnerable to infestation. If you have oak trees in or near your garden they are vulnerable too. The adult moth can easily spread their dangerous caterpillars. Please be on the alert.
The caterpillars hatch out from eggs in March and April. They then make a nest of fine silk on either the trunk or branch of an oak tree. During the late spring and summer, the caterpillars leave their nests to head out into the foliage at dawn and dusk to feed on leaves. They move around nose to tail in a procession, hence their name. The procession leaves a silken thread behind which wends its way up the trunk of the tree and across branches.
It is relatively easy to identify the caterpillars which break out of, and return to, their nests made of fine silk webbing. The dark hairy caterpillars are about 25 mm long and it is the hair or bristles which produce inflammatory toxins (thaumetopoein and closely related compounds). which can damage your skin, lips and lungs.
Apart from the damage to oak trees, the caterpillars and their nests represent a threat to public health and to the health of both domesticated and wild animals. So, it is important that you and your children and pets do not touch or even go near the caterpillars.
In the UK there are few natural predators of the moths such as the praying mantis. So, where there are infestations they must be cleared away by manual intervention using pesticides. If you see this moth’s nest or caterpillars report it to the Forestry Commission.
You are best advised to not to tackle the caterpillars or nests yourself. The hairs of the caterpillar can blow around in the air. The nests and caterpillars need to be eliminated by professionals wearing protective clothing.
The symptoms vary from person to person. Some people do not respond to a mild exposure to the hairs but others, who are more sensitive, may develop a skin rash. It is almost certain that everyone will be affected by direct contact with the caterpillars to produce a skin rash or even cause asthma if the hairs are breathed in. The toxin can also cause inflammation to the lips, throat and eyes. In rare cases, the symptoms can be so severe that urgent medical attention is required. The toxin is even light sensitive and skin rashes can recur after the initial symptoms have disappeared. Mild rashes can be treated with ant-histamine cream.
It is difficult if not impossible to remove all the hairs and bristles of the moth by washing affected cloths which cannot be used again and are best incinerated.
Dogs and cats and livestock can develop similar symptoms to human beings but of course they cannot tell you where they have been to help identify a cause. It would be far better if we could rid ourselves of the moths altogether.
In southern Europe there is a similar species, the Pine Processionary Moth – (Thaumetopoea pityocampa). This moth makes similar nests and the caterpillars look the same and produce the same toxins. My wife and I came across their nests whilst walking in a pine forest near Bordeaux, curiosity did not get the better of us and we instinctively kept away from them. It was only researching this article that alerted me to what had seen. The nests were in trees all around us. The Pine Processionary Moth has not reached the UK yet and let’s hope that it never does to add to the problem.
1840 Map by Trevor Morgan – April 2018
For centuries the landscape of Britain has been altered by man. Before the advent of farming the territory was covered by forest. Kent, itself, was covered with broadleaf forest. Gradually the woods were cleared for farming. The inhabitants of Britain changed from a lifestyle of free roaming hunter gatherers to sedentary farmers. With the advent of farming man started to live in villages and towns. Land was cleared for agriculture. And, many of our forests were felled to produce wooden beams to build ships and houses.
Farming caused the human population to expand considerably and it changed the organisation of society. Land ownership and power were inextricably linked.
As man started to dominate and clear the forests many iconic species were extirpated. The Lynx became extinct in the 8th C. The Brown bear became extinct in the 11th C. The wolf was hunted to extinction by the 17th C. The South of England lost its last wild cat at the beginning of the 19th C. Beavers disappeared from our watercourses some 400 years ago.
Whilst most of our large mammal predators were being hunted to extinction our ancestors were busily introducing other species to our landscape including rabbits, hares, fallow deer and rats.
In 1840 Darrick and Newstead Woods were completely surrounded by a rural landscape. A person walking through the woods would have been met by an air of tranquillity. It would have been possible to hear your softest breath and hear the breeze quietly blowing through the trees. Bird song would have been more apparent and so would the buzz of the innumerable insects flying over the meadow and through the trees.
Horses were employed to do the heavy work on the neighbouring farms but mechanisation using steam engines was slowly being introduced much to the chagrin of farm workers who believed that their jobs would be endangered.
Few people would have been walking through the woods. There were no dog walkers; dogs were not kept as pets. Dogs were kept for work purposes only. Some owners would be using their dogs to hunt for rabbits.
No-one would have been jogging through the woods to keep fit. There were no leisure walkers. There were no sign posts or benches or paved paths. The woods were managed for the collection of firewood, nuts, fruits and building material.
There was very little traffic noise. A visitor to the woods would have heard the blacksmith striking iron near the coaching house in Farnborough. The neighing of horses would also have been clearly heard. There were no cars and no A21. The bells of the local churches would have been audible from miles away. Sometimes, when the animal and human activity died down, the woods would have been almost completely silent.
There was no leisure activity. There were no tennis courts or Zumba dance classes. There was no running track. There was no litter.
Only birds and insects would have been flying in broad daylight but bats would have been plentiful in the dusk of the summer and autumn evenings. There would have been no roar of jet engines or buzzing of propellers.
At night the sky would have been extremely dark and almost black on moonless nights. However, the night sky would have been so peppered with stars it would have been difficult to pick out some of the constellations. The eerie sound of owls and nightjars would have penetrated long distances across the night sky. The moon would have cast deep shadows on cloudless nights. There was no orange glow, from street lighting, in the sky well after sunset. Few ventured out in the darkness of a moonless night except poachers. The dark skies were an astronomer’s delight.
There was no pressure on the local community to protect and preserve Darrick and Newstead Woods as the rural way of life had remained almost the same for a couple of centuries or more.
Today we would see the Darrick and Newstead Woods of those times as part of a peaceful rural idyll. In 1840, however, the countryside was hardly a leisure centre. Life was much more difficult for everyone even the wealthy; diseases such as influenza, measles and tuberculosis could kill anyone. A broken leg could lead to death or a life time disability. The poor were encumbered with the additional problems of bad housing, hard work and a bad diet. Darrick and Newstead Woods were just part of the rural working environment and the living situation was a far cry from the easier times of today.
The 1805 Ordnance Survey Map
A modern time traveller going back to 1805 would recognise most of the names of the neighbouring villages in the vicinity of Darrick and Newstead Woods. Orpington and Farnborough were just simple Kent villages. High Elms was a privately owned estate. Darrick and Newstead Woods were named as State Wood on the 1805 map. It is not certain why the name of the woods was changed.
Our time traveller would only be familiar with the names of the neighbouring villages and the general layout and usage of the area. The nature of the society would be completely alien. Life was dominated by rural activity for nearly everyone. Timekeeping was a completely different concept controlled by sunrise and sunset and the passing of the seasons. How would a time traveller from 2017 survive without clocks, pre-packed foods, supermarkets and central heating? Rural life no longer holds sway in a modern society actively using cars, mobile ‘phones, computers and holding steady jobs.
1840 Ordnance Survey Map
Between 1805 and 1840 little had changed even though State Wood had changed its name. No-one living near Darrick and Newstead Woods would have dreamt that, within just over a century, the population would become part of the megalopolis of London. They dreamt that they would remain men and women of Kent forever.
In 1840 Darrick and Newstead Woods were part of an almost completely rural environment which had not changed much in hundreds of years. The woods covered a larger area and housing estates had not yet encroached upon the outer boundaries of the woods. Darrick and Newstead woods was situated mostly in the Crofton Manor parish of Orpington which at that time had a population of about 700. Part of the woods were in the parish of Farnborough which also had a population of around 700.
Because of the almost completely rural nature of the surrounding area the wild life would have been more diverse and abundant than today. Rabbits would have been common in the meadows near Darrick Woods and stoats would have been preying upon them. Hedgehogs would have been thriving. The squirrels would have been the red variety rather than the grey. There would have been no rose-ringed parakeets living in the woods. The bluebells in the woods would have been pure bred British varieties.
Insect and floral life would also have been more abundant because there was less urban occupation and farmers were not using systematic insecticides and herbicides.
Large birds of prey would not have been seen hovering over Darrick Woods, however, as the persecution of Buzzards was well underway and 1820 was the last year in which they bred in Kent until recently. Red Kites had also been extirpated.
It should not be assumed that because the landscape was rural that it was natural. Many centuries of farming even before the Romans had arrived had meant that Kent had lost most of its natural forest and the remaining woodland in areas such Darrick Wood were managed by the local population. Oak trees were still being felled for housing materials and ship building. Woodland was still being cleared for the expansion of domestic housing and the new workshops starting to be created by the industrial revolution
The soil is clay and sand based and there was poor drainage in the woods and meadows. To the north of Darrick wood a visible stream fed the upper reaches of the river Kyd Brook. The woods also drained into Worley’s Hole near Tubbenden Lane and a visible stream from this natural reservoir fed the upper reaches of the river Cray in Orpington.
The 1805 Ordnance map shows the woods as being called State Wood but this name was later changed to Darrick and Newstead woods. The name Darrick possibly means “Dark Oak”.
Throughout the 19th century, and until half way through the 20th century, the parishes of Farnborough and Orpington were part of the county of Kent.
The local economy was dominated by farming. Farmers rented their land from the landed gentry. The majority of the population were labourers who worked on the farms. Shopkeepers and artisans such as shoemakers and farriers served the local population. Apart from agriculture, the woods and the surrounding area supported fruit trees, hunting for game birds, farming for herbs and flowers, gathering nuts and wood for kindling. Farming and agriculture not only supported a permanent workforce but also a force of seasonal workers which included gypsies who lived in the local area.
The winter of 1840/41 was severe and most 19th century winters were much colder than the winters of today. During the decade of the 1840s there were many years when there were wet summers. There was a failure of the grain harvest in England in 1845 and of course humid conditions led to the potato blight famine in Ireland.
The Years around 1840
Victoria became queen in 1837 and she married Prince Albert in 1840.
Life for people in and around Darrick and Newstead Woods and Farnborough village in 1840 was little changed but the Industrial Revolution was starting to stir things: people were leaving the countryside for work in the factories.
The effect of the Enclosure Acts from 1750 to 1860 was really beginning to tell. The enclosure of common land meant that poorer villagers were displaced from open fields where they could grow crops and feed their livestock. These villages then had to turn to labouring work for money to make a living. The wages of the labourers began to fall. This lead to the Swing riots. The Enclosure Acts also led to rural depopulation. Workers moved to the cities and big towns to find work in industry. Some of them emigrated.
New political ideas were spreading and in the wake of the French revolution there was a desire for social change which resulted in the formation of the Chartist movement in 1832. It was not just the lower echelons of society that were organising for social change. The rising middle class was also supporting change and the Establishment was about to finally abolish all forms of slavery in 1843.
Advocates for social change were also pressing for improved working conditions for the labouring classes and the education of their children.
Emigration to Australia and the other colonies became popular. It was not only convicts that colonised Australia and other territories but also free settlers who used emigration agents to facilitate their journey.
In 1840 the Treaty of Waitangi established New Zealand as a British colony and legal entity
The first Opium War was taking its course from 1839 to1842
The first Anglo Afghan War was fought between1839 to 1842.
The objectives of the Chartist movement 1832
Male suffrage – every man, regardless of class or property, should have the vote. Women were not included in this objective.
An end to the regional differences in the electoral system.
Secret ballots (no one else would know for whom you voted).
The end to property qualifications for MPs. This would mean that a man wishing to be an MP would no longer have to own property or land worth a set amount of money.
Payment for MPs – this would enable men who were not already wealthy to stand for election to Parliament.
Workers were very poor, and living conditions in their cottages would have been primitive by today’s standards. Labourers’ cottages were poorly built and cold, in winter rain would have leaked in. There was overcrowding and the housing was often multi-occupancy. There was little room for privacy. Most labourers could not afford to buy their own home and the rent was a considerable proportion of their weekly income. Many cottages were tied to the estates upon which the labourers worked and this meant that labourers lost their home if they lost their job. Labourers’ cottages were poorly furnished with just stools or benches to sit on. Better off labourers could afford to keep a pig and chickens in the back yard.
Land owners and tenant farmers lived in much better accommodation of course. In 1840, however, in the Farnborough area there were a few things in common for all. There was no piped water, mains electricity and gas or sewage systems. There was no easy link to London or the network of railways. To get news you had to buy a newspaper and read it, if you could. The penny black postage stamp was introduced in 1840 but sending a letter for a farm labourer would have been very expensive, even if he could write.
Well off labourers could afford to eat bread, onions and root vegetables every day supplemented by cheese and bacon two or three times a week. The less well-off fared more poorly. Nobody ate a varied diet so most people, including the rich, suffered from vitamin deficiency.
The gentry, landowners, farmers and professional classes wore tailored clothing.
Clothing for labourers was often handmade at home or was bought second or third hand.
It would have been relatively easy for a landowner, farmer or labourer to have fitted in to the rural life of two centuries earlier.
No one was contemplating the right of women to vote not even the Chartists. Men were always given priority over women even amongst the educated and middle and professional classes. Divorce was very much controlled by the religious authorities and acts of parliament until 1857 when divorce became part of the civil law. Divorce was an expensive affair in the 1840s and was strictly controlled by the ecclesiastical authorities there was very little chance of obtaining a divorce. It was much easier for a man to divorce his wife that it was vice versa. A woman who was trapped in a loveless or violent marriage had little recourse.
In 1836 civil weddings were allowed for the first time and this meant that a couple could marry in a registry office or in a place of worship other than the Church of England. Marriage, of course, was limited to a man and a woman.
It was not until the Victorian era that people married for love only. Financial and practical considerations would have been prime up until then at all levels of society and parents exercised considerable influence upon who their children could or should marry.
For most of the 19th century a married woman had no property rights and when a woman married all of her property became that of her husband. If a divorce was granted custody of the children was automatically granted to the husband. Women were basically the subjects of their husband.
Unmarried mothers were really looked down upon and mistreated. An unmarried man who was about to father a child would have been forced to marry his partner.
Children born out of wedlock had severely limited rights.
Jobs and economy
Farm workers had been getting poorer – the daily average pay for a labourer in 1810 was around 24 old pence or 2 shillings. By 1840 the daily wage rate had fallen to about 20 old pence per day.
There were paper mills in St Mary’s Cray and Foxes brewery opened up in Green Street Green. There was an Oast house in Orpington High Street to serve the local brewery.
Industrialisation started to alter farming methods in the 1830’s and this led to the Swing riots, when farm workers revolted against steam driven threshing machines and low wages. The discontent continued into the 1840s.
Society was still divided and very hierarchical. The landowners and gentry were the wealthiest and most privileged and these were followed by: the professionals; clergy, tenant farmers, artisans and farm labourers who were the poorest.
The hours for the farm labourer were long and a 12 hour working day was common. Rest days were irregular. Children worked. Only the very rich could afford not to work at all. There were no retirement plans and no pensions. When you got old and were unable to work you had to rely on your family and friends or the poor house unless you were very well off. The average age of death meant that few people lived past their 50th birthday.
1844 Bromley Union Workhouse was built at Locksbottom. Once you were installed in the workhouse it was difficult to get out. A poor person needed the approval of the local clergy and gentry to be allowed to enter the workhouse. If you were debarred from the work house then you were in severe difficulty; being homeless in 1840 would have been near to a death sentence.
The Bromley Union population in 1840, including Orpington and Farnborough, was 14,000. Bromley town itself was about 4,000.
With regard to health: the well off and well fed and clothed and were better able to resist infections and were generally healthier than the poor. However, modern health treatment was in its infancy. Research into bacteriology and virology was almost no-existent. If you caught measles, whopping cough, chicken pox or diphtheria then you had to rely upon your own body’s immunity for protection. If you were a poor child with compromised immunity you could easily be condemned to death by a disease such as whooping cough or influenza. More serious diseases such as Tuberculosis were killers of both the rich and poor and medical science could do little to save you.
Diseases of poor hygiene were also prevalent and there were regular outbreaks of cholera, typhus and typhoid. Life expectancy was much lower than today a new born boy in 1841 could be expected to live an average of 40 years and girls to 42 years. The average age of death was brought down by the serious numbers of child deaths. Childhood diseases took heavy toll.
Unless you were well off and could afford to maintain a horse and carriage or use the Sevenoaks turnpike, you were limited to short journeys to the next village or so. Soldiers and sailors could get to travel to foreign lands by courtesy of the state but many did not return home. Some of them were killed in battle and others decided to stay in the colonies where they felt they had a better future.
Of course people did travel across the country the rich could afford to travel on turnpikes which connected to the main cities and to the developing railway system. Skilled workers also were given the opportunity to travel from one town or village to another. By 1850 the railways were in full swing providing workers from the country to factories.
There was much petty crime in rural areas including theft, robbery and poaching. A lot of this crime went unreported. Justice for crime amongst the labouring classes was often settled on an unofficial basis. Crimes against the gentry, farming or professional classes would have been settled at petty session courts or the assizes. Punishments for simply crimes such as poaching were often severe. In 1840 you could have been transported to the colonies for a petty crime. But, by 1840 the death penalty was reserved for murder and treason.
Life was only relatively good for the landowners, the gentry and professional people in rural areas. The fortune of a tenant farmer was dependent on the climate and weather and the success of the harvest. It was also dependent upon the many plant and animal diseases which could ruin agricultural production. In 1840 industrial farming was in its infancy, farming was labour intensive and hardly mechanised. Farm labourers remained poor and if the harvest failed they became poorer. Farming has always meant long hours of working and dedication to the seasons of planting and harvest. Animals have to be cared for. Considerable time has to be dedicated to animal husbandry. For many labourers this dedication of their lives to the daily duties of agriculture for little reward became intolerable. Many left farms for the factories in urban centres which were rapidly growing but their lives were hardly better and their lives were still under control. They exchanged the timetable of the harvest for the whistle at the factory gate.
Rural life pressed on, however, the increased numbers of factory workers had to be fed so farming production had to increase; the industrial revolution on the farm was about to begin.
Rural life was about to change and the relationship between the local population and the rural landscape was also about to change.
We are lucky that the changes to come did not result in the disappearance of Darrick and Newstead Woods altogether. The economic value has changed from supporting the rural community to a resource that supports nature conservation and leisure activity.